IJBED
Print ISSN 2051-848X Online ISSN 2051-8498 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 12 Issue 02

Examining current regional intensity of trade in Africa: How strong are the trade linkages and implications for intra-Africa trade in the African Continental Free Trade Area

Published: 03 Dec 2024 Issue:Volume 12 Issue 02 Nov 2024 Author details below

Mutambara Tsitsi Effie

Rhodes University, Department of Economics and Economic History, South Africa

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is a continent-wide free trade area which is expected to pave way for a continental customs union. This article assessed the current state and extent of intra-Africa trade in 2001-2018. The results give insights into the foundation which the current regional economic communities in Africa have put in place regarding intra- and inter-trade linkages. This is a foundation which the AfCFTA would utilise to achieve trade integration in a continent-wide economic integration arrangement that seeks to improve intra-Africa trade. Five regional groups were considered, namely Arab Maghreb Union, East African Community, the Economic Community of West African States, Economic Community of Central Africa States, and the Southern African Development Community. Intra-regional trade intensity index results show that trade within individual regional groups, and within Africa, is oriented towards respective member countries, although there is no evidence of increased inward orientation over time. Inter-regional trade intensity index results show that most regional groups trade intensively with each other, albeit at different levels. With increased market access in the AfCFTA through lower trade resistances between regional groups, inter-regional trade is expected to increase as per the volume of trade criteria in the natural trading partners hypothesis.

Article History

Published 03 Dec 2024

How to Cite

Effie, M. T.. (2024). Examining current regional intensity of trade in Africa: How strong are the trade linkages and implications for intra-Africa trade in the African Continental Free Trade Area. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 02.

Citation Context

Archive cited by 1 article
Reference depth 33 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Effie, M. T.. (2024). Examining current regional intensity of trade in Africa: How strong are the trade linkages and implications for intra-Africa trade in the African Continental Free Trade Area. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 02.

MLA

Effie, Mutambara Tsitsi. "Examining current regional intensity of trade in Africa: How strong are the trade linkages and implications for intra-Africa trade in the African Continental Free Trade Area." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 02, 2024.

Chicago

Mutambara Tsitsi Effie. "Examining current regional intensity of trade in Africa: How strong are the trade linkages and implications for intra-Africa trade in the African Continental Free Trade Area." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 12 Issue 02 (03 Dec 2024).

Harvard

Effie, M. T. (2024) Examining current regional intensity of trade in Africa: How strong are the trade linkages and implications for intra-Africa trade in the African Continental Free Trade Area. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 02

Cited By In This Journal Archive

References

  • African Union Commission. 2019.     2019 African Regional Integration Report: Towards an integrated and prosperous and peaceful Africa, Addis Ababa (Ethiopia).
  • African Union, Africa Development Bank, and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. 2020. Africa Regional Integration Index Report 2019. AU, ADB, UNECA.
  • African Union, Africa Development Bank and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. 2019.  Africa Regional Integration Index (ARII) 2019 Technical Report. AU, ADB, UNECA.
  • African Union, Africa Development Bank and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. 2016. Africa Regional Integration Index Report 2016. AU, ADB, UNECA.
  • Appleyard, D.R. and A.J. Field, 2017. International Economics. 9e. McGraw-Hill Education, New York. 
  • Bouët, A., A. Sy, and F. Traoré. 2021. “Diagnostic of trade policies, measures and instruments on agriculture in West Africa.” Report for the FARM-TRAC Project. Markets, Trade and Institutions Division (MTID), International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Bouët, A., L. Cosnard, and D. Laborde. 2017. “Measuring Trade Integration in Africa.” IFPRI Discussion Paper 01667. August 2017.
  • Commission for Africa. 2005. “Our Common Interest: Report of the Commission for Africa. March 2005 Report of the Commission for Africa.” [Online]. Available: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Full_Report_1461.pdf [Accessed on 28 January 2022].
  • Ekeke, A.C. 2017. “The potential effect of the economic partnership agreements between EU and Africa on Article 22 of the African Charter.” De Jure Law Journal 50(2):303-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2017/v50n2a6
  • Hamanaka, S. 2015. “The selection of trade integration indicators: Intraregional share, Intensity, Homogeneous intensity, and Introversion Index.” ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 455. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/128569 [Accessed 20 January 2020].
  • Hurt, S.R., D. Lee, and U. Lorenz-Carl. 2013. “The Argumentative Dimension to the EU-Africa EPAs.” International Negotiation 18(1): 67-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341250
  • Iapadre, L., and F. Luchetti. 2010. “Trade Regionalisation and Openness in Africa.” EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/54.
  • Iapadre, L., and F.  Tironi. 2009. “Measuring trade regionalism: The case of Asia.” UNU-CRIS Working Papers. W-2009/9. United Nations University – Comparative Regional Integration Studies, BE – Belgium. 
  • Iapadre, P.L., and L. Tajoli. 2013. “Emerging countries and trade liberalisation: A network analysis.” Journal of Policy Modelling 36S (2014): S89-S110.
  •  Iapadre, L. 2006. “Regional integration agreements and the geography of world trade: Statistical indicators and empirical evidence.” In: P De Lombaerde (ed). Assessment and Measurement of Regional Integration. Routledge, OXON OX14 4RN. 67-85.
  • Iapadre, L. 2004. “Regional integration arrangements and the geography of world trade: Measurement problems and empirical evidence.” UNU-CRIS e-Working Papers. W-2004/3. United Nations University.
  • Khadan, J. and R. Hosein. 2013. “New empirical insights into the “Natural Trading Partner” Hypothesis for CAROCOM Countries.” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA). MPRA Paper No. 50493. [Online]. Available: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50493/ [Accessed 9 April 2019].
  • Lagan, M. 2019. Why Europe urgently needs to rethink its unfair trade deals with Africa. Dialogue of Civilizations (DOC) Research Institute. [Online]. Available: https://doc-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Langan_Fairer-trade-in-Africa.pdf  [Accessed 15 January 2022]. 
  • Lipsey, R.G. 1960. “The theory of customs unions: A general survey.” The Economic Journal 70(279): 96-513.
  • Marinov, E. 2014. “Economic integration theories and the developing countries.” MIPRA Paper No. 63310, September: 164-177. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA).
  • McCarthy, C.L. 1999. “Polarised development in a SADC Free Trade Area.” South African Journal of Economics 67(4): 375-410.
  • Mutambara, T.E. 2013. “Examining South Africa’s trade with the Southern African Development Community (SADC) with the SADC Free Trade Area initiative in place.” MIBES Transactions International Journal Volume 7 (2013): 63-78.
  • Mutume, G. 2006. “New barriers hinder African trade – Health standards in rich countries limit continent’s ability to export.” [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/january-2006/new-barriers-hinder-african-trade  [Accessed on 18 January 2022].
  • Nagar, D., and F. Nganje. 2016. The African Union: Regional and global challenges. Centre for Conflict Resolution.
  • Shakur, S. & Nees, C. 2011. “An application of the natural trading partner hypothesis to New Zealand-ASEAN trade.” Economics Bulletin 31(4): 3077-3088.
  • South African Revenue Service. 2020. “Part 8: Agreement Establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area.” Government Gazette No. 44049 No. R. 1433. Date: 2020-12-31.
  • Tralac. 2023.     Status of AfCFTA Ratification. [Online] Available at https://www.tralac.org/resources/infographic/13795-status-of-afcfta-ratification.html [Accessed on 30 April 2024].
  • Traore, D. 2018. “African Continental Free Trade Area-Objectives, Challenges and Perspectives.” Presentation at PEGNet Conference. Cotonou-Benin 11 and 12 October 2018.
  • United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. 2019. Making sense of regional integration indexes: A guide to better understand and use the information contained in regional integration indexes. ARII User Guide. African Trade Policy Centre (ATPC) of the ECA. UN Economic Commission for Africa (2019). [Online]. Available:  https://arii.uneca.org/Reports/en-US/ARII_UserGuide_2019.pdf [Accessed 12 January 2022].
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2021. Implications of the African Continental Free Trade Area for Trade and Biodiversity: Policy and Regulatory Recommendations UNCTAD/DITC/TED/INF/2021/3.
  • Woolfrey, S., and S. Bilal. 2017. “The impact of Economic Partnership Agreements on the development of African value chains Case studies of the Kenyan dairy value chain and Namibian fisheries and horticulture value chains.” Discussion Paper ECDPM – EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT POLICY MANAGEMENT No. 213. June 2017. www.ecdpm.org/dp213 
  • World Bank. 2020. The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and Distributional Effects. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433.
  • World Trade Organization (WTO) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2012. A practical guide to trade policy analysis. WTO, UNCTAD.
     

Related Articles

Browse Articles

Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling
Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling