IJBED
Print ISSN 2051-848X Online ISSN 2051-8498 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 03 Issue 1

The new determinant creation theory: a way to attract new foreign direct investment flows

Published: 06 May 2015 Issue:Volume 03 Issue 1 Mar 2015 Author details below

Juan Carlos Botello Osorio

Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, A.C.

Martin Davila

Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

According to the literature related to the movement of foreign direct investment (FDI) worldwide, there are two main causes for these flows. The first one is related to the decision taken by companies to invest in certain markets according to their own international strategy and, the second corresponds to the government’s policy designed to attract capital through the use of various factors such as infrastructure, skilled labour, cheap labour, industrial policy, natural resources, gross domestic product, the legal system, geographic location, cancellation fees, among others. Thus, governments attract capitals to certain types of industries using the attractiveness of their determinants. Considering the above approach, if a government wants to attract capital to an industrial sector different than to which traditionally it tries to attract, should it create new determinants to attract new investment flows? This paper proposes a new theory to attract new investment flows based on the creation of new determinants. To develop this new determinant creation theory, the case of Mexico is analyzed.

Article History

Published 06 May 2015

How to Cite

Osorio, J. C. B. & Davila, M.. (2015). The new determinant creation theory: a way to attract new foreign direct investment flows. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 03 Issue 1.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 59 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Osorio, J. C. B. & Davila, M.. (2015). The new determinant creation theory: a way to attract new foreign direct investment flows. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 03 Issue 1.

MLA

Osorio, Juan Carlos Botello, and Martin Davila. "The new determinant creation theory: a way to attract new foreign direct investment flows." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 03 Issue 1, 2015.

Chicago

Juan Carlos Botello Osorio and Martin Davila. "The new determinant creation theory: a way to attract new foreign direct investment flows." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 03 Issue 1 (06 May 2015).

Harvard

Osorio, J. C. B. & Davila, M. (2015) The new determinant creation theory: a way to attract new foreign direct investment flows. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 03 Issue 1

References

  • public policy scope for south east European countries”, Eastern Journal of European Studies, Volume 1, Issue 2.
  • Berkoz, L. & Sence, S. (2009). Locational Preferences of FDI Firms in Turkey: A Detailed Examination of Regional Determinants. European Planning Studies, 17(8), pp. 1243-1256
  • Bliss, Ch. I. (1934). The method of probits. Science 79 (2037),  pp. 38–39.
  • Botello, Juan C. and Martín Dâvila (2013). Public Policy as a Determinant for Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico since 2000-2013. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 2(1), pp. 78-89
  • Botric, V., Skuflic, L. (2006). “Main determinants of foreign direct investment in the southeast European countries”, Transition Studies Review, Volume 13, No 2.
  • Broadman, H.G. & Sun, X. (1997). The Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in China, The World Economy, 20(3), pp. 339-362
  • Deichmann, J., Karidis, S. & Sayek, S. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey: Regional Determinants, Applied Economics, 35(16), pp. 1767-1778.
  • Dunning, J. (1988). “Explaining international production” London: Unwin Hyman
  • Engle, Robert F. and Clive W. J. Granger (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), pp. 251-276
  • Erdal, F. & Tatoglu, F. (2002). Locational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investments in an Emerging Market economy: The Turkish experience, Multinational Business Review, 10(1), pp. 21-27
  • Figueroa, S. (2012). Emergent Vulnerability in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: The Case of Mexico. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 11, pp. 374-385
  • Goodspeed, T., Martinez-Vazquez, J. y Zhang, L. (2009). “Public Policies and FDI Location: Differences between developing and developed countries”, International Studies Program Working Paper, GDU paper No 0910
  • Granger, Clive W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), pp. 424-438
  • Granger, Clive W. J. and Paul Newbold (1974). Spurious Regressions in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, pp. 111-120
  • Groh, A., Wich, M. (2009). “A Composite Measure to Determine a Host Country´s Attractiveness for FDI”. IESE Business School Working Paper Number 833
  • He, C. (2002). Information costs, agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment in China, Regional Studies, 36(9), pp. 1029-1036
  • Hill, Charles. (2012). “International Business”, 12 Ed. USA. McGraw Hill.
  • Kinoshita, Y. (2003). “Why does FDI go where it goes? New Evidence from the transition economies. William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 573
  • Lim, D. (1983). Fiscal incentives and direct foreing investment in less developed countries, Journal of Development Studies, 19(2), pp. 207-212
  • Mariotti, S. & Piscitello, L. (1995) Information Cost and Location of FDI´s Within the Host Country: Empirical Evidence from Italy, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), pp. 815-840
  • Mendoza, J. (2011). Impacto de la Inversión Extranjera Directa en el Crecimiento Manufacturero en México. Revista Problemas del Desarrollo, 167(42), pp. 45-69
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Aguascalientes (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Baja California (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Baja California Sur (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Campeche (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Chiapas (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Chihuahua (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Coahuila (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Colima (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Distrito Federal (2000), Programa General De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Durango (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Mexico (2000), Plan De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Guanajuato (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Guerrero (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Hidalgo (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Jalisco (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Michoacan (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Morelos (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Nayarit (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Nuevo Leon (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Oaxaca (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Puebla (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Quintana Roo (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Queretaro (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De San Luis Potosí (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Sinaloa (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Sonora (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Tabasco (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Tlaxcala (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Veracruz (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Yucatán (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Mexico, Gobierno Del Estado De Zacatecas (2000), Plan Estatal De Desarrollo (2000-2012).
  • Morgan, R., Katsikeas, A. (1997). Theories of international trade, foreign direct investment and firm internationalization: a critique, Management Decision, 35(1), pp. 68-78
  • Ondrich, J. & Wasylenko, M. (1993). Foreign Direct Investment in the United States (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)
  • Popovici, C., Calin, A. (2012). Attractiveness Of Public Policies For Fdi In Central And Eastern European Countries. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1(1), 61-67.
  • Rasiah, R. (2000). Globalization and Private Capital Movements. Third World Quarterly, 21(6), pp. 943-961.
  • Steinbrecher, G. & Shaw, T. (2008). Quantile mechanics. European Journal of Applied Mathematics 19(2), pp. 87–112.
  • Wald, Abraham (1940). The Fitting of Straight Lines if Both Variables are Subject to Error. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, pp. 284-300.
  • Wei, Y., Liu, X. Parker, D. & Vaidya, K. (1999). The Regional Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in China. Regional Studies, 33(9), pp. 857-867.

Related Articles

Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico
The role of state competitiveness and perceived insecurity in attracting foreign direct investment in Mexico
Micro and macroeconomic determinants of profitability of conventional banks and stock performance using Tobin’s Q ratio: Evidence from the banking sector of Pakistan
The crowding effects of foreign direct investment on domestic investment: Evidence from Asia

Browse Articles

Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling
Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling