Effects of cost and benefit in regularising business procedures in Gauteng: the SMEs paradox - South Africa
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
Gauteng Province is regarded as Economic hub of South Africa due to its industrialisation, Manufacturing and business. Besides it is also known as the capital City of the country and occupies 1.4 % of land space. It contributes35.6% towards GDP to the country and 10% GDP to the entire African continent.SMEs contribute 42% of employment in the formal economy and 2 million of informal businesses. While close cooperation comprise 78 % of the total registered entities providing more than 20 % annual growth rate. This paper aims to examine the cost and effects of regularising business procedures in Gauteng, South Africa. The objective of the study is to investigate the extent to which regularising business procedures impact on converting SMEs to Pty under the new companies Act. The t-test was used to test the hypothesis and the significance level was p<00. The study employed a structured questionnaires and interviews with targeted participants operating as SMEs in Gauteng provinces of South Africa. The sample size comprised of 114 businesses that were randomly selected using five point Likert-scale ranging from One to Five (1)High Extent and (5) No Extent in Gauteng. Chi-square was mainly relied on as a statistical testing. The response rate was 97%. The result indicated that there were more costs than benefits in regularising business. Intensive consultation should have been engaged and awareness be made rigorously with the stakeholders.
Article History
How to Cite
Chiloane-tsoka, E. & Rasivhetshele, A.. (2014). Effects of cost and benefit in regularising business procedures in Gauteng: the SMEs paradox - South Africa. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 02 Issue 1.
Citation Context
APA
Chiloane-tsoka, E. & Rasivhetshele, A.. (2014). Effects of cost and benefit in regularising business procedures in Gauteng: the SMEs paradox - South Africa. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 02 Issue 1.
MLA
Chiloane-tsoka, Evelyn, and Am Rasivhetshele. "Effects of cost and benefit in regularising business procedures in Gauteng: the SMEs paradox - South Africa." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 02 Issue 1, 2014.
Chicago
Evelyn Chiloane-tsoka and Am Rasivhetshele. "Effects of cost and benefit in regularising business procedures in Gauteng: the SMEs paradox - South Africa." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 02 Issue 1 (01 Apr 2014).
Harvard
Chiloane-tsoka, E. & Rasivhetshele, A. (2014) Effects of cost and benefit in regularising business procedures in Gauteng: the SMEs paradox - South Africa. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 02 Issue 1
References
- Babbie, E. (2007).The Practice of Social Research. Belmont: Thompson Wadsworth.
- Bartholomew, K. Antonia, J.Z., & Marcia, J.E. (2000).Coded semi-structured interviews in psychological research. In H.T. Resi& C.M. Judd (Eds),Handbbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 286-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Booysen, T. (2010).The New Companies Act compliance.Entrepreneur online newspaper, 09-10 October.Sandton Sun, JHB.
- Chiloane GE, and Rankhumise, ES. 2012. Small, medium and micro enterprise owners’ perceptions regarding the implementation of the new companies act: A South African perspective. African Journal of Business Management,6(51): 12095-12100.
- Coolidge, J. &Ilic, D. (2009).Tax Compliance Perceptions and Formalization of Small Businesses in South Africa.World Bank: Policy Research Working Paper, 4992.
- Davies, R. (2009). Companies Act. South African Government Information. Government Gazette.
- Davies, R. 2010. DTI to prepare businesses for New Companies Act.Department of Trade and Industry. South Africa.
- Djankov.S, La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. &Shleifer, A. 2000. The regulation of entry. Boston: Harvard Institute for Economic Research.
- Entrepreneur Magazine. 2012. A Basic Guide to the New Companies Act and how it applies to you.
-
Foreign Investment Advisory Service (Fias). 2007. "Sector Studies of the Effective Tax Burden." Report series of studies conductedin Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C. www.fias.net/ifcext/fias.nsf/Content/Pubs_BusinessTaxation - Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rdEd. Sage publications Ltd.
- Hitchcock, R. (2009). The New Companies Act (Act 71, 2008); The King III Tm code of governance.
- Global Competitive Report 2010/2011.
- King, M. E. (2009). King Report III on Corporate Governance. The code of governance. Johannesburg, South-Africa.
- Leedy, P.D. and Ormrod, J.F. (2001).Practical Research Planning and Designing. New Jersey: Merritt Prentice Hall.
- Maas, G.(2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: based on (2009) Report on Entrepreneurship. London: London Business School
- Mashamaite, K. (2011). Phasing out of CC in South Africa. Radio interview.
- Reitz.(2009). New companies Act and its formalization. Financial Reporting
- Steenkamp.(2009). New companies ACT 0F 2008 and its implementation. SA.
- South Africa. (1973). Companies Act, No. 61 of 1973: An explanatory guide. Pretoria: Government Printers.
- South Africa. (2008). New Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008: An explanatory guide. Pretoria: Government Printers.
- Welman, C., Kruger, F.& Mitchell, B. (2005). Research Methodology. 3rd Ed. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
- USAID. (2008). Qualitative and quantitative research on SMEs in Gauteng. Available online at: http://www.slideshare.net/odewa/gauteng-sme-study-2008. Accessed (04/06/2013)