Managerial competency, government owned organisations, gender differences, power structure, male and female managers


This study involves a comparative examination of gender differences in managerial competency of government owned organizations. The population consisted of 45 males and 35 females respondents drawn from the selected organizations through convenience sampling. Findings indicated that men predominantly occupied the managerial positions in government owned organizations under review and individual differences seemed more striking than gender differences because the structure of the organization shaped the behavior of how the managers functioned. It was also revealed that in the area of effectiveness on the use of control measures, female managers succeeded because they were able to draw upon what was unique to their experiences as women. They have learned how to manage effectively without relying on the control of resources and power to motivate others. Women who were hitherto successful have not received much recognition or credit. The male managers in this study were able to out-perform their female counterparts in all skill areas because of the organizations power structures although women approached these challenges in similar fashion like their male counterparts. In other words, if women possessed power within an organization, their effectiveness will be similar to that of men. Gender differences will play a limited role where there is a balance in the power structure. Therefore, managers should not be judged based on their gender but as individuals. In view of the a

Full Text : PDF

  • Aka, N. (2001) Research Methodology in the Behavioural Sciences. Longman Nigeria Plc, Nigeria.
  • Aaltio, L (2002) Interviewing Female Managers: Presentations of Gendered Selves in Contexts. In I. Aaltio & A.J. Mills (2002) Gender, Identity and the Culture of Organizations. (pp. 201-219). London: Routledge.
  • Acker, J. (1992) Gendering Organizational Theory. In A. MiNs and P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering Organizational Theory. (pp.248-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Andrea, E.L. and Ellen, A. F. (1998) Sex Roles: A Journal of Research.
  • Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1995) Leadership and Assessment in Vinnicombe, S. and Colwill, N. L. (Eds) The Essence of Women in Management, Prentice- Hall, p. 336.
  • Annstrong, M. & Baron, A. (1995) The Job Evaluation Handbook. London. Institute of Personnel and Development.
  • Atkins & Dobrofsky, (1978) The Relationship between Gender Role Stereotypes & Requisite Military Leadership Characteristics - 1, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, Oct, 2003.
  • Auster, E.R. (1993) Demyslifying the Glass Ceiling: Organizational and Interpersonal Dynamics of Gender Bias. Business and the Contemporary World, Summer 1993, 47-68.
  • Baiil, G.L., Elbert, N., Mahar-Potter, S. and Reavy, G.C. (1989) Are Androgynous Managers Really More Effective? Group and Organization Studies, 14,234-249.
  • Bartol, K.M., & Butterfield, D.A. (1976) Sex Effects in Evaluating Leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61,446454.
  • Bass, C.D. (2000) What Abilities do you bring to the Job? The Dallas Morning News; Chicago Tribune. Pp. 26, Jan., 2.
  • Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1999) Training Full Range Leadership: “A Mind Garden Leadership Development Demonstration.
  • Bass, B.M., Krusell, J., & Alexander, R.A. (1971) Male Managers’ Attitudes towards Working Women. American Behavioural Scientist, 15, 22 1-236.
  • Bennis, W. “Transforming Our Work Ethic: Four Traits of Leadership”. Education Network News, Vol. 3, 1984, pp. 1-3.
  • Berryman-Fink, C., C. Brunner and Chandler, T. (1986) Issues in the Study of Interpersonal Conflict Management Behaviour. Ohio Speech Journal. 26,26-73.
  • Billing, Y., & Aivesson, M. (1989). Four ways of looking at women and leadership Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5 (1), 63-80.
  • Bowman, G.W., Worthy, N.B., & Greyser, S.A. (1965) Are Women Executives People? Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, pp. 15-28.
  • Brenner, O.C., Tomkiewicicz, J., & Schein, V.E. (1989) The Relationship between Sex Role Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics Revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669.
  • Bratton, D. (1998) Develop a Framework of Core Competencies. Madison. Credit Union Magazine. Vol. 64, issue 10, pp. 17-18 Oct.
  • Broverman, I.K., Broverman, D.M, Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S.R. (1970) Sex Role Stereotypes and Clinical Judgments of Mental Health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1-7.
  • Broverman, I. K., Brovennan, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz P., & Vogel, S.R (1972) Sex Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
  • Brunner, M. (1999) A New Definition of Competency. Washington Rural Communications. Vol. 18, issue 6, pp. 42-45, Nov/Dec.
  • Brush, C.G (1992) Research on Women Business Owners’ Past Trends, A New Perspective, Future Directions, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. 16, (Summer), 5-30.
  • Burns, J. M. (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Baridam, D.M (2001) Research Methods in Administrative Sciences. Paragraphics, Port Harcourt.
  • Croxton, F.E, Cowden, D.J and Kleins (1973). Applied General Statistics. Prentice- Hall, New Delhi.
  • Carli, L.L. (1989) Gender Differences in Interaction Style and Influence. Journal of and Social Psychology, 56(4), 1989. Pgs 565-576.
  • Chappell, C. (1996) Quality & Competency Education and Training. In the Literacy Equation, Red Hill. Pp. 71-79. Queensland Council for Adult Literacy.
  • Chu.nir, L.H. and J. Mills (1989) Gender Differences in Conflict Resolution Styles of Managers: At Work and at Home. Sex Roles. 20, (34), 149-163.
  • Cuming, M.W. (1993) The Theory and Practice of Personnel Management (7th Ed). Heinemann, London.
  • Carli, L.L. (1989) Gender Differences in interaction Style and Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 1989. Pgs 565-576.
  • D. M. (2001) Research Methods in Administrative Sciences. Paragraphics, Port Harcourt.
  • Dalton, M. (1959) Men Who Manage. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Daly, K. & Ibaim, H. (1995) Gender Differences in Managerial Behaviour: The Ongoing Debate. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.
  • Day, D.R. & Stogdill, R.M. (1972) Leader Behaviour of Male & Female
  • Dobbins, G.H., & Platz, S. J. (1986) Sex Differences in Leadership: How Real Are They? Academy of Management Review, 11, 118-127.
  • Donnell, S. M. and Hall, J (1980) Men and Women as Managers: A Significant Case of no Significant Difference. Organizational Dynamics, pp 60-77.
  • Eagly, A. H., and Steffen, V.J. (1986) Gender Stereotypes, Occupational Roles and Beliefs about Part-Time Employees. Psychology of Women Quarterly 10, pp 252-262.
  • Eagly, A.H. Makhijani, M.G., and Klonsky, B.G. (1992) Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Builettin 111(1), pp. 3-22.
  • Eagly, A.H. and B.T. Johnson. (1990) Gender and Leaderstyle: A MetaAnalysis. Psychological Bullettin, vol. 108, (2), 233-256.
  • Eagly, A.H., Karau, S. J., Miner, J.B., and Johnson, B. (1994) Gender and Motivation to manage: A Meta-Analysis. Leadership Quarterly, vol. 5, pp 135-1 59.
  • Eagly, A.H. and Makhijarn, M.G. (1992) Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 111, (No. 1), pp 3-22.
  • Fg1y, A.H., & Wood, W. (1999) The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408-423.
  • Eagly, A. H.,(1987) Sex Differences in Social Behaviour: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
  • Fg1i, A. H., Miadinic, A., & Otto, S. (1989) Are Women Evaluated more &vourably than Men? An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-2 16.
  • Eagli, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000) Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M.
  • Frank, l{ and Aithoen, S. C (1994) “Statistics: Concepts and Applicati Cambridge University Press, U. K.
  • Gutek, B. A. And Morasch, B. (1982) Sex - rations, Sex - roles Spillove
  • Sexual Harassment of Women at Work. A Journal of Social Issues. io (4), pp. 55-74.
  • Mas, R D, Lind, D. A and Marchal, W. C (1999) Business and Economics (10th Ed) Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • McNeil, P. (1990) Research Methods. Tavistock Publications Ltd, London.
  • Mullins, L J. ((1999) Management and Organizational Behaviour. 5th edition, Financial Times, Prentice Hall.