The impact of political parties on foreign direct investment within Mexico
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
Today we can identify a variety of political and economic systems in the world. A free market economic system is more likely to work if it is based on a democratic political system. According to the Democracy Index 2021, Mexico went from being an imperfect democracy to a hybrid regime, with the risk of becoming an authoritarian regime. The transition from a political system of imperfect democracy to a hybrid regime represents a great risk for domestic and foreign private investment. There is a latent political risk for investors in this type of countries, which scares away foreign direct investment.
This research presents an analysis of the behavior of foreign direct investment in Mexico from 2000 to 2021 by state and political party. The results from a point biserial correlation test prove the existence of a dependence between the attraction of foreign investment and the political party in government. Mexico attracted lower capital inflows since the presence of MORENA, actual political party that is in both, the federal and some state governments. Descriptive statistics show that in most of the matches there is a dependence and also a correlation, however it is prudent to study the direction of this relationship and the strength.
The findings are based on an analysis of three years of government of the MORENA political party; therefore, a longer period could be considered for future research.
Article History
How to Cite
Botello, J. C. & Baltazar, C. B.. (2024). The impact of political parties on foreign direct investment within Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 01. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V012N01/ART-01
Citation Context
APA
Botello, J. C. & Baltazar, C. B.. (2024). The impact of political parties on foreign direct investment within Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 01. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V012N01/ART-01
MLA
Botello, Juan Carlos, and Carlos Botello Baltazar. "The impact of political parties on foreign direct investment within Mexico." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 01, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V012N01/ART-01
Chicago
Juan Carlos Botello and Carlos Botello Baltazar. "The impact of political parties on foreign direct investment within Mexico." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 12 Issue 01 (11 May 2024). https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V012N01/ART-01
Harvard
Botello, J. C. & Baltazar, C. B. (2024) The impact of political parties on foreign direct investment within Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 12 Issue 01. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V012N01/ART-01
References
- Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World economy, 29(1), 63-77.
- Botello, J. and Davila, M. (2023). Insecurity and political uncertainty: Factors that Influence the Fall of Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico. The Business and Management Review, 14(2), 65-71.
- Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/8-P), Santiago, 2021.
- Chichón, J. (2007). Democracia y Autoritarismo en América Latina: en busca de la Década Perdida (1995-2005), América Latina Hoy, 46, 173-199.
- Department of social communication. (2022). Comunicado de prensa número 735/22. México: Instituto Nacional de Estad´sitica y Geografía.
- Elizalde et. Al (2022). Impacto del Riesgo-País en la Inversión Extranjera Directa en México. EnsayosRevista de Economía, 41(1), 1-16.
- Filipe, J.A., Ferreira, M.A., Pacheco, M., and Moura, D. (2012). FDI Political Risks: The New International Context.
- International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance & Economic Sciences.
- Hayakawa, K., Kimura, F., and Lee, H. (2011). How does country risk matter for FDI. Institute of Development Economies, 51(1), 60-78. doi. 10.1111/deve.12002
- Hill, Ch., and Hult, T. (2019) International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace. 12 ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Iloie, R. (2015). Connections between FDI, Corruption Index and Country Risk Assessments in Central and Eastern Europe. El sevier. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32,626–633.
- Jensen, N., and McGillivray, F. (2005). Federal Institutions and Multinational investors: Federalism, Government Credibility and Foreign Direct Investment. International Interactions, 31:303-325.
- Jensen, N. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. Int. Organ. 57(3):587–616.
- Korstanje, Maximiliano y (2013), “DEMOCRACIA Y AUTORITARISMO: LA RAZÓN POPULISTA.” Nómadas.
- Critical Journal of Social and Juridical Sciences, Núm. Especial: América Latina
- Mezú, R. (2020). Democracia vs. Crecimiento económico: ¿Quién fue primero, el huevo o la gallina? Revista Ciencia y Poder Aéreo, 15(2), 18-31.
- Morales, J. y Tuesta, P. (1998). Calcificaciones de crédito y Riesgo-país. Estudios Económicos, 1-26.
- Naranjo, A. (2021). Estabilidad de los Regímenes Políticos e Inversión Extranjera Directa, período 1969 al 2008, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 227-254.
- Rafat, M., and Farahani, M. (2019) The Country Risks and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Iran. Econ. Rev. 23 (1), 235-260