Remittances, Household Poverty, Heckman’s Endogenrity Test, Rural Areas, Urban Areas, Geo-Political Zones.


In 2015, the inflow of international remittances to Nigeria stood at $20.5 billion (World Bank, 2016). This represents 3.5% of the global flow and 58.5% of the Sub-Saharan Africa’s estimate. In spite of this increased flow, household poverty has remained pervasive in Nigeria. Previous studies have focused on the impact that aggregate remittances have on household poverty without considering the roles of the different types of remittances (cash, food and other remittances) on household poverty in Nigeria. This study was, therefore, designed to analyse the impact of the various types of remittances on household poverty across the rural and urban areas and the six geo-political zones of Nigeria. The study was premised on consumption theory which incorporates remittances as a form of income that affects household consumption. The methodology was similar to that of Mukherjee and Benson (2003). In this study, the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) was used to estimate the mean of the per capita expenditures (which were compared with the absolute poverty line) of remittance-receiving households against households, community and regional profiles. Probit regression was used as robustness checks on the OLS estimates. In order to examine the effect of endogeneity, the Heckman’s two-stage estimation technique was deployed. The impact of aggregate, cash, food and other remittances on household poverty are chequered in rural, urban and across the six geo-political zones. These impacts are felt strongly in the rural and urban areas as well as in the North Central, South East and South West zones than in other geo-political zones of Nigeria.

Full Text : PDF

  1. Adams, R. H. (1991). The Effects of International Remittances on Poverty, Inequality and Development in Rural Egypt. Washington D.C., Page 14-23.
  2. Adams, R. H. (1998). Remittances, Investment and Rural Asset Accumulation in Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change 47.1: 155 173.
  3. Adams, R. and Page, J. (2003). International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain: A study of 24 Labour Exporting Countries. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3069. World Bank Poverty Reduction Group: Washington D.C.
  4. Adams, R. and Page, J. (2005). Do International Migration and Remittances Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries? World Development 33.10: 1645 1669.
  5. Aigbokhan Ben E. 2000. Poverty, Growth and Inequality in Nigeria: A case study. African Economic Research Consortium (AERC), Research Paper 102, October 2000.
  6. Aigbokhan Ben E. (2000). Adult Equivalence, Scale Economics, Gender and Poverty in Nigeria. The Nigerian Economy and Financial Review, vol. 5 (2): page49-73.
  7. Ajayi, M., Mukaila, I., Gafar T., Raji A., Mufthau I. and Sidikat L. (2009). International Remittance and Well-being in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics and International Finance 1.13: 78 84.
  8. Babatunde, R. and Martinette, E. 2010. Impacts of migrant remittances on food security and nutrition of farming households in Kwara State, Nigeria. Shocks in developing countries submitted for consideration by the House of Common Select Committee on international development in the course of the inquiry into migration and development.
  9. Castles, S. and Kosack, G. (1973). Immigrant Workers and Class Structure in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.
  10. Chami, F. and Jahjah, S. (2005). Are immigrant remittance flow a source of capital for development? IMF Staff papers 52.1: 1 48.
  11. Chimhowu, P. and Pinder, C. (2003). Assessing the impact of migrant remiitances and poverty. Presented at EDINS Conference on New Direction on Impacts Assessment for Development Method and Practise. November 24-25, 2003.
  12. Chukwuone, N., Amaechina E., Emeka, E., Evelyn I. and Benjamin O. (2012). Analysis of Impact of Remittances on Poverty in Nigeria. Centre for Entrepreneurship and Development Research and Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. Partnership of Economic Policy Working Paper 2012-09 financed by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), Government of Canada through International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).
  13. De Haan, A. (2000). Migrants Livelihood and Rights: The Relevance of Migration in Development Policies. Social Development Working Paper 4. Department of Food and International Development (DFID): London.
  14. DFID (2006). Bilateral Remittances Corridor Analysis Initiatives (BRCAI): The Challenge of Embracing Formal Transfer System in a Dual Financial Environment. Excerpts from the Publication presented at the 2nd International Conference on Migrant Remittances, DFID London, November 13 14.
  15. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47.1: 153-161.
  16. HNLSS (2009/2010): Harmonised Nigerian Living Standard Survey (HNLSS).
  17. Milanovic, B. (1987). Remittances and Income Distribution. Journal of Economics Studies 14.5:  24 37.
  18. Friedman, Milton (1974). The Permanent Income Theory of Consumption - A Restatement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 88.2: 228-250.
  19. Mukherjee, S. and Benson, T. (2003). The Determinants of Poverty in Malawi. 1998. World Development 3.2: 339 358.
  20. NBS (2010): Nigeria Poverty Profile.
  21. Nyamongo, Esman; Misati, Roseline and Ndirangu, Lydia (2012). Remittances, Financial Development and Economic Growth in Africa. Journal of Economics and Business 64.3: 240 260.
  22. Odozia, J., Awoyemi, T. and Omonona, B. (2010). Household Poverty and Inequality: The Implication of Migrants Remittances in Nigeria. Journal of Economic Policy Reforms 13.2:  191 199.
  23. Olowa, O., and Shittu, A. 2012. Remittances and income inequality in rural Nigeria. Journal of Business Management and Economic 3.5: 210 221.
  24. Osili, U. (2007). Remittance and Savings from International Migration: Theory and Evidence using a Matched Sample. Journal of Development Economics 83.2: 446 465.
  25. Page, J. and Plaza, S. (2005). Migration, Remittances and Development: A Review of Global Evidence. Journal of African Economic Research 15.2: 245 336.
  26. Paine, S. (1974). Exporting workers: The Turkish case. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Rajan, G. and Subramanian, A. (2005). What Undermines Aid’s Impact on Growth? IMF Working Paper 05/126, Washington D.C.
  28. Rukhsana, K. and Shahbaz, M. (2008). Remittances and Poverty Nexus: Evidence from Pakistan. Social Policy and Development Centre.
  29. Sander, C. 2003. Migrant Remittances to Developing Countries. Paper presented for DFID, Bannock Consulting.
  30. Taylor, E. and Mora, J. (2005). Determinants of Migration, Destination and Sector Choice. Disentangling Individual Households and Community Effects. The World Bank and Palmgrave Macmillian.
  31. Viet, Nguyen C. (2008). Do Foreign Remittances Matter to Poverty and Inequality? Evidence from Vietnam. Economics Bulletin 15.1: 1 11.
  32. Vu and Baulch (2011). Assessing Alternative Poverty Proxy Methods in Rural Vietnam. Oxford University Studies 39.3: 339-367.
  33. World Bank, (2016). Migration and Remittances Factbook 2016.