Connectivity, Business and Trade, Economic and Social Development


The fundamental theme of ‘economic growth driven concept’ introduced by China through ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ is to connect the business world in the contemporary environments of today and in times to come. Business and trade are fundamental to all economic pursuits of communities and societies. The people being more quality consciousness are looking for better, affordable and easily available products. This implies that in times to come, firms producing goods and services would require to be more competitive, innovative and agile to come up-to the standards of consumers. That is possible when they are better connected in people to people and state dimensions for sustaining growth of business and trade. 
The spirit behind Chinese Initiative of creating a network of roads and track appears to be idealized for mutual businesses where all stakeholders have win-win positions. The economic and social growth is the idea behind this initiative and countries especially those involved through corridors have very important roles to play for its ultimate success. ‘Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has two main components; one is ‘Silk Road Economic Belt’ and second ‘Maritime Silk Road’ covering land and sea voyage respectively. It covers Europe, Africa, Eurasia, Middle east, South East Asia and East Asia. Pakistan becomes its part through China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). 
The paper aims at analyzing BRI with respect to its economic benefits to the states and social cohesion through business communications and interactions. It is based on secondary data about BRI and related economic corridors. Its analysis is based on mix methodology, corroborating quantitative and qualitative aspects. In its findings, the paper provides avenues of socio-economic developments of participating states and implications on cultural aspects as well as challenges. In its concluding parts, it also invites further studies to continue providing more academic insights to the readers. 


Full Text : PDF

  • Ali, e. a., 2017. The potential socio-economic impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Asian Development Policy Review, 5(4), pp. 191-198.
  • Ali, A. (2015). China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Prospects and Challenges for Regional Integration. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 7(1), 1–15.
  • Aqeel, M. (2016). Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor, as per data available.
  • China Daily. (2019). Funding of BRI - Google Search. Retrieved from
  • Economic Times. (2017, May 8). China says CPEC attracted USD 46 billion 
  • investments: www// The Economic Times. Retrieved from 
  • Express Tribune. (2019). CPEC, Gwadar and the road ahead | The Express Tribune. Retrieved from 
  • Hali, Shukui and Iqbal. (2016). Completion of CPEC: Impact on Pakistan’s Strategic Position and Economy: Islamabad Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from
  • McKinsey. (n.d.-a). Fig. 1. The map of One Belt and One Road initiative. Source: McKinsey... Retrieved from
  • McKinsey. (n.d.-b). the map of One Belt and One Road initiative. Source: McKinsey Company.... | Download Scientific Diagram. Retrieved from 
  • Pakistan Today. (2019). ‘Communication network in Balochistan being improved’ | Pakistan Today. Retrieved from
  • Pakistan Today. (n.d.). Pakistan, China reject criticism against CPEC | Pakistan Today. Retrieved from
  • Rosengard, J. K. (2004). Banking on Social Entrepreneurship: The Commercialization of Microfinance. Mondes en development, no 126(2), 25–36.
  • Stephanie Petrella. (2017). Economic Corridors. Retrieved July 28, 2019, from
  • Tanoli, J. R. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Gwadar and Chabahar: The Two Rival Ports. 7.
  • Viktoria Akchurina. (2018). Mapping the Belt and Road Initiative: Geography and Architecture | TRENDS. Retrieved from
  • World Bank. (2017). Belt and Road Initiative [Text/HTML]. Retrieved from