IJBED
Print ISSN 2051-848X Online ISSN 2051-8498 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 05 Issue 1

Multinationals, International Arbitration, and the World Trade System: Confronting the Inconvenient Issues in the WTO

Published: 27 Mar 2017 Issue:Volume 05 Issue 1 Mar 2017 Author details below

Anna Lanoszka

University of Windsor

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

While most studies examining the weaknesses of the WTO (World Trade Organization)  focus on shortcomings of its institutional arrangements and structural tensions between the two fundamental principles of the WTO - the single undertaking and the decision-making by consensus - this work takes a different view. It attributes the WTO's limitations to the neglect of essential subjects on the negotiating agenda and the omission of important actors at the negotiating table. The world trade system is in trouble -  it has become divided between the organization that supposed to efficiently manage international trade  and corporate actors who engage in global trade practices. Consequently, the article argues that to be relevant the WTO has to adapt to the changing nature of international trade by opening its doors to the business community and by allowing negotiations of plurilateral agreements among interested parties. The very idea that the WTO should remain exclusively an intergovernmental organization where only states propose and negotiate contracts appears to be more fitted for the nineteenth century mercantilist world.  The globalizing economy of today is driven by powerful players that are not only states but also corporations. However, under the WTO's current arrangement , corporate actors are completely outside the WTO's institutional structure. The organization deals only with states, manages inter-state multilateral agreements, and resolves  inter-states disputes   Consequently, suggestions are offered on how to revitalize the organization, which still presents opportunities for improving economic development worldwide and making the global economy function more efficiently and cooperatively.

Article History

Published 27 Mar 2017

How to Cite

Lanoszka, A.. (2017). Multinationals, International Arbitration, and the World Trade System: Confronting the Inconvenient Issues in the WTO. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 05 Issue 1.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 31 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Lanoszka, A.. (2017). Multinationals, International Arbitration, and the World Trade System: Confronting the Inconvenient Issues in the WTO. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 05 Issue 1.

MLA

Lanoszka, Anna. "Multinationals, International Arbitration, and the World Trade System: Confronting the Inconvenient Issues in the WTO." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 05 Issue 1, 2017.

Chicago

Anna Lanoszka. "Multinationals, International Arbitration, and the World Trade System: Confronting the Inconvenient Issues in the WTO." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 05 Issue 1 (27 Mar 2017).

Harvard

Lanoszka, A. (2017) Multinationals, International Arbitration, and the World Trade System: Confronting the Inconvenient Issues in the WTO. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 05 Issue 1

References

  • Abbott, F.M., 2002.  " The TRIPS-legality of measures taken to address public health crises:
  •  Responding to USTR-State-industry positions that undermine the WTO" in The Political
  • Economy  of International Trade Law, Kennedy, D.  L.M. and  Southwick, J.D., (eds.)
  • Cambridge University Press, pp. 311-342.
  • Anderson, S and Cavanagh, J., 2000. The Top 2000: The Rise of Corporate Global Power, Institute for Policy Studies, Washington, DC.
  • Bremmer, I., 2010. The End of the Free Market - Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations?,  Portfolio,
  • Buckely, R.,  Vai lo L. and Boulle, L., 2008.  "Challenges to Multilateral Trade - The Impact of Bilateral, Preferential and Regional Agreements" Published by Wolters Kluwer.
  • Chowla, P., 2005. "Comparing Corporate and Sovereign Power," Developments - Journal of the Development Studies Institute, 1(1).
  • Thomas Dietz (2014) "Does International Commercial Arbitration Provide Efficient Contract 
  • Enforcement Institutions for International Trade?" in Mattli, W. and Dietz, T., (eds.)
  • International Arbitration and Global Governance: Contending Theories and Evidence.Oxford University Press, pp.168-195.
  • Feketekuty, Geza., 2000.  "Assessing and Improving the Architecture of GATS" in GATS 2000 -
  • New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, Sauvé P. and Stern, R.M.,  (eds.) Published by the Brookings Institution, pp. 85-111.
  • Fuller, L.L., 1978. "The Forms and Limits of Adjudication", Harvard Law Review, 92 (2), pp. 353-409.
  • Hale, T., 2014. "What is the Effect of Commercial Arbitration on Trade? in Mattli, W. and Dietz,
  • T., (eds.) International Arbitration and Global Governance", op. cit., pp. 196-213.
  • Hoekman, B., Martin, W. and Mattoo, A., 2010.  “Conclude Doha: It Matters!,” World Trade Review, 9 (3), pp. 505-530.
  • Hoornweg, D. P., Bhada, M., Freire, C.L. Trejos Gomez, R. Dave., 2010. Cities and Climate Change:An Urgent Agenda. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Johnston,  A  M.  and Trebilcock, M.J.,  2013. "Fragmentation in international trade law: insights from the global investment regime"  in World Trade Review , 12 ( 4)  pp. 621-652.
  • Lanoszka, A., (2009) The World Trade Organization - Changing Dynamics in the Global Political Economy. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Mattli, W., and Dietz, T., 2014. "Mapping and Assessing the Rise of International Commercial
  • Arbitration in the Globalization Era: An Introduction" in Mattli, W. and Dietz, T., (eds.)  International Arbitration and Global Governance" op. cit, pp. 1-21.
  • Mattoo, A. and Subramanian, A., 2009.  ‘The world must go beyond Doha’, Financial Times, 6 January.
  • Monks, R.A.G and Minow, N., 2011. Corporate Governance (5th ed.) Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Palmeter, D., 2003. The WTO as a Legal System - Essays on International Trade Law and Policy, London, UK: Cameron May.
  • Schelling, T.S., 1980. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schultz, T., 2014. Transnational Legality - Stateless Law and International Arbitration, Oxford  University Press.  
  • Smith, F., 2009.  Agriculture and the WTO – Towards a New Theory of International Agricultural  Trade Regulation, Edward Elgar.
  • Weaver, C.,  2008. “Hypocrisy Trap – The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wolfe, R.,  2005. “See you in Geneva? Legal (Mis) Representations of the Trading System,” European Journal of International Relations. 11(3), pp. 339-365.
  •  

Browse Articles

Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling
Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling