IJBED
Print ISSN 2051-848X Online ISSN 2051-8498 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 04 Issue 3

How does procurement capability maturity affect e-Procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain

Published: 17 Dec 2016 Issue:Volume 04 Issue 3 Nov 2016 Author details below

Pongpanga Pongsuwan

National Institute of Development Administration Bangkok

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

This study refers to the research model of Batenburg (2008) which defined procurement functions to six maturity dimensions; strategy, processes, control, organization, information, e-Technology as the starting point and indicates twenty-two items to support capability maturity measurement which is called Procurement Competitive Capability Maturity (PCCM). This model is used for a company to assess current practices of procurement function and perceives the level of its capabilities. The data collection is from a survey of fifty-two selected procurement organizations in Southeast Asia (SEA) countries; from Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the significant value of industry type, size of spending and centralized/decentralized procurement that affect procurement capability maturity. The results show that the industry has no relation to the capability maturity; the size of procurement spend has a positive relation to the capability maturity, and the centralized procurement has higher capability maturity than the decentralized. Moreover, this study extends the knowledge of e-Procurement and digital context to leverage procurement processes and visible procurement integration in an organization and across the supply chain.

Article History

Published 17 Dec 2016

How to Cite

Pongsuwan, P.. (2016). How does procurement capability maturity affect e-Procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 04 Issue 3.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 29 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Pongsuwan, P.. (2016). How does procurement capability maturity affect e-Procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 04 Issue 3.

MLA

Pongsuwan, Pongpanga. "How does procurement capability maturity affect e-Procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 04 Issue 3, 2016.

Chicago

Pongpanga Pongsuwan. "How does procurement capability maturity affect e-Procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 04 Issue 3 (17 Dec 2016).

Harvard

Pongsuwan, P. (2016) How does procurement capability maturity affect e-Procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 04 Issue 3

References

  • Batenburg, R. &Versendaal J., 2008. Maturity Matters: Performance Determinants of the
  • Procurement Business Function, 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Galway, Ireland.
  • Van Weele, A., 2004.Purchasing and Supply Chain Management Analysis, Strategy,
  • Planning,and Practice, 4th Edition, London: Thomson, pp. 16.
  • Robinson, P. & Wale, D. & Dickson, G., 2010.Events Management. Cambridge, MA: CABI.
  • Rolstadas, A., Hetland, P.W., Jergeas, G. F. &Westney, R. E., 2011.Risk Navigation Strategies for Major Capital Projects: Beyond the Myth of Predictability, London NY: Springer.
  • Segev, A., Beam, C. &Gebauer, J.,1998. Procurement in the Internet Age–Current Practices and Emerging Trends (Results From a Field Study). Working Paper 98-WP-1033, Fisher Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Kraljic, P., 1983. Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review,
  • September–October, pp. 109–117.
  • Thomson, D. and Singh, M., 2001.A Macro Level Business Model For E-Enabled Procurement,CollEcTeR Conference, Coffs Harbour, December 3-4.
  • http://aseanup.com/benefits-asean-economic-community-aec[Access June 2016]
  • Croom, S. & Johnson, R., 2003. E-service: Enhancing Internal Customer Service through
  • E-procurement. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5).
  • Rozemeijer, F.A., van Weele, A., Weggeman, M., 2003. Creating Corporate Advantage through Purchasing: toward a contingency model. The Journal of Supply Chain Management: a global review of purchasing and supply 39, 4-13.
  • Rosemann, M. and de Bruin, T., 2005.Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model. In proceedings of the European Conference on Information System (ECIS), Regensburg, Germany.
  • Iversen, J.,Nielsen, P.A. and Norbjerg, J. , 1999. Situated assessment of problems in software
  • development. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 30 (2), pp.66-81.
  • Schiele, J. J., & McCue, C., 2006. Professional Service Acquisition in Public Sector Procurement: A Conceptual Model of Meaningful Involvement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26 (3): 300-325.
  • De Boer, L., Harick, J., Heijboer, G., 2002. A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 8, 25-33
  • Gunasekaran, A., &Ngai, E.W.T., 2008. Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 159-175.
  • Lefebvre, L., Lefebvre, E., Elia, E, &Boeck, H., 2005. Exploring B-to-B e-commerce adoption
  • trajectories in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 25, 1443-1456.
  • Teo, T.S.H., Lin, S., & Lai, K. (2009). Adopters and non-adopters of e-procurement in Singapore: An empirical study. The International Journal of Management Science, 37, 972-987.
  • Presutti, W.D., 2003. Supply Management and E-procurement: Creating Value Added in the Supply Chain. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 219-26.
  • Giner, A. H., Alberto, A. A., Guillermo, C.R., &Cuauhtemoc, S. R. , 2011. Improving E-Procurement in Supply Chain Through Web Technologies: The HYDRA Approach, Supply Chain Management - New Perspectives, Prof. Sanda Renko (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307- 633
  • Lancioni, R.A. Smith, M.F. Oliva, T.A. , 2000. The role of internet in supply chain management logistics catches up with strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 45-56.
  • Aberdeen Group, Spend Analysis, pp. 16, August 2007.
  • Vision 2020: The future of procurement, Ideas for Procurement in 2020 by Industry Leading Procurement Executives, Published on 30 Oct 2013.
  • Nunnally, J. C., 1978. Psychometric Theory, 2ndEdition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Related Articles

Browse Articles

Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling
Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling